Medicaid Planning Lesser Known Asset Protection Strategies
A Radio Interview of Attorney John R. Frazier by Attorney Joseph Pippen
A complete transcript of the program begins below:
Attorney Pippen:
Hey, Attorney John Frazier’s on the line. Let’s go to John. Good morning, John.
Attorney John Frazier.
Attorney Frazier:
Hey, Joe. How you doing?
Attorney Pippen:
Going good. John is our Medicaid VA attorney and he calls in with the Tip of the Week, just about every week. So, John, what are we talking about today?
Attorney Frazier:
Today, I’m going to talk about a couple of Medicaid planning lesser known asset protection strategies. I would say that some of these strategies, most clients have never heard of, and then some clients have likely not heard of some of these other ones, too. The four strategies I was going to talk about, we have something called a Burial Savings Account here in Florida. So a Medicaid applicant is allowed to have a bank account called a Burial Savings Account up to $2,500 and also, the spouse is allowed to have that also for up to $2,500, so that creates an extra $5,000 asset limit for Medicaid applicants and their spouse.
Attorney Pippen:
John, let me ask a question for that.
Attorney Frazier:
Yes.
Attorney Pippen:
Suppose you set up a Burial Savings Account and the money is not used. I mean, suppose for example, the person didn’t know they had already prepaid part of the funeral plan and then they have $2,500 set aside and not all of the money is used, what happens to that money then?
Attorney Frazier:
Well, this is a very confusing thing I think, and this is something really, I would say none of my clients have ever even heard of this before. Even banks oftentimes have not heard of it, but a Burial Savings Account is actually a bank account as opposed to a funeral service or a cremation contract, which is an actual contract with a funeral service provider. So the way that we set these up is the Medicaid applicant is going to have a bank account, which will say the Medicaid applicant’s name, and then Burial Savings Account in the title, right after the person’s name. We will also always set up a beneficiary on these accounts. It’ll be either POD, TOD, or ITF, that would be Transfer on Death, Payable on Death, In Trust For. They all really mean the same thing, so if you don’t put the beneficiary on there, you will create a probate situation, which we definitely always need to avoid in a Medicaid scenario.
So the way that it works, is if the Medicaid applicant or recipient passes away, or if the spouse passes away, the beneficiary would take the death certificates to the bank, present their ID card, and then the bank would issue a check for the balance in the Burial Savings Accounts to the beneficiary. The nice thing about this strategy is, it’s tax-free, so there’s no taxes on that $2,500 or whatever’s left in the account, and it can be used for anything. It does not have to be used for burial purposes. It’s actually a very, very nice strategy. One of the downsides is, because most of the banks have never heard of this, some banks will not do it because they just don’t know what it is, but it’s really just a savings account.
Attorney Pippen:
Alright, do you have a list? Not that you have to mention it on the air, but do you have a list of banks or clients that want to do this? Do you have a bank contact that knows how to set these up?
Attorney Frazier:
Oh, yeah. Yeah, we do have bank contacts and sometimes we have to communicate directly with the bank to explain it to them, just so that they understand that all it is, is a savings account. I think once it’s explained to the banker, most of them will cooperate, but in some cases they won’t, and there are some banks that are a little bit notorious for not having the greatest customer service, so we will direct our clients away from those banks.
Attorney Pippen:
Alright, so what’s the next of the Medicaid planning lesser known asset protection strategies to cover?
Attorney Frazier:
The next one is a funeral service or cremation contract. The state of Florida says that a funeral service or a cremation contract of any value is exempt for both the Medicaid applicant and the spouse, as long as it’s made irrevocable, so whenever we have a client purchase one of these contracts, we always tell them that they must make it irrevocable, which means that it can’t be cashed in and get the money back on it, and then you can shelter any amount of money for that. I typically see between maybe $1,500 up to $8,000. I had one client who spent $25,000 on a funeral service with all sorts of extra flowers and things like that, so that’s another thing that’s a good thing to consider when you’re looking to apply for Medicaid. Another thing that I think many people find to be strange is the purchase of an automobile is exempt.
The Medicaid applicant and the spouse are allowed to have one car between the two of them of any value. Extra cars, as long as they’re older than seven years old, and non-luxury vehicles are also exempt. We have actually used this strategy for individuals in nursing facilities without a driver’s license. The way that we do that is, the car can be purchased with the person who has the Power of Attorney, it would be titled in the name of the Medicaid applicant, and then the state of Florida allows us to add another driver for insurance purposes, and it’s actually permissible to do that. I’ve had people buy a variety of different cars under those circumstances. In some cases it’s been a wheelchair van to pick up the family member in the nursing facility, but it doesn’t have to be and it could be one car of any value.
That’s a nice way to shelter, sometimes a very significant amount of assets, because it’s certainly possible to spend between $30,000 and $70,000 on a new car, and the only tax consequences are sales taxes, so that’s a nice thing to consider. And then, the next one that I think a lot of people don’t really think about too much, is the purchase of household items. Any items that a person has around a house, other than things like expensive paintings, or jewelry, things like that, that would not be exempt. But if you have a house which needs new furniture, carpeting, countertops, things like that, stereo systems, televisions, computers, a wheelchair would be exempt, hearing aids are exempt, so there’s a whole list of items. Those things are all exempt, and it often makes sense to consider those asset restructuring strategies. I did have one client who spent between $80,000 and $90,000 on putting new items in the house and the state of Florida did not question that, so that’s another effective way to shelter assets for Medicaid planning lesser known asset protection strategies.
Attorney Pippen:
John, what would you tell someone who’s listening to all this and their thought is, “Well, that doesn’t seem right. I mean, you shouldn’t be able to buy a $70,000 car and go on Medicaid. I thought Medicaid was just for poor people.” I mean, I’m sure there’s some listeners out there who have that thought pattern going on in their head as we’re talking about this. I know what I would tell a person like that, but let’s hear what you would tell a person who questioned you about how you can do these types of things when Medicaid’s supposedly designed for poor people?
Attorney Frazier:
Well, I think there’s a number of considerations. One is that, it’s lawful. This is completely legal. It’s all based in the law, the Florida Department of Children and Families has its rules, which cover all of these things, so these are all spelled out in the rules/ And I have a background in tax law, and I think you can make potentially the same argument about tax law. You hear these stories about some very wealthy corporations not paying any taxes, and what those corporations are doing, is using the law to maximize their benefits, so that’s what we do. We use the law to maximize benefits. The other thing is, a couple of other considerations, the average cost of care now is about $9,700 a month, so in short order, if a person has $50,000, that that money is all going to be gone.
Also, an individual who currently has assets paid into the system during their lifetime, as opposed to an individual who really paid nothing into the system and is already qualified for Medicaid, would still be eligible for those same benefits, but paid much less into the system. I think that’s another consideration, that they’ve paid into the system and now it’s time to be repaid by the government, in a sense. Another thing I think to consider is, that most of our clients have some sort of an estate plan, so they’re going to name their children or whoever they want as beneficiaries. I have never seen a will or a trust that names a nursing facility or an assisted living facility as a beneficiary, so I think it’s important to consider we’re typically working with the Power of Attorney that we’re also implementing the estate planning considerations of the Medicaid applicants, because they oftentimes will have a will or a trust that actually names individuals as beneficiaries, so we are implementing the client’s wishes in that respect, also.
Attorney Pippen:
My standard answer to that question, John, generally is, “I’m an attorney and you’ve asked me how to do some Medicaid planning and what options there are. My job is to explain the options to you and I’m not suggesting one or the other, I’m telling you what your options are and for you to make the decision.” It’s always the client’s decision on if they want to do some of this planning, if they want to buy a $70,000 car, and so that helps qualify for Medicaid, that’s their choices. It’s not our choice, we’re just giving them their options. That’s how I generally respond.
Attorney Frazier:
Exactly, I agree 100% and I think most attorneys are actually trained in law school that they’re not really making decisions for clients, they’re presenting options and that’s the case, and any type of law. Whether it’s criminal defense, estate planning, elder law, marital family law, your job as an attorney is to present the options to the client and then let the client decide among those various options.
Attorney Pippen:
Yeah, I would say the higher percentage of clients are all for whatever can be done to maximize government benefits and maximize what the person can save in their estate as their legacy, more or less, that they want to pass on.
Attorney Frazier:
Exactly. I think also, we hear in the news, the amount of government expenditures on things, which I think many people would consider to be wasteful and we’re talking about huge amounts of money, trillions and trillions of dollars. On the other hand, here, we’re talking about typically an elderly, disabled individual who’s paid into the system and now simply wants to get something back based on what they’ve paid into the system during their entire lifetime. I think from more of a global, bigger picture perspective, there’s certainly nothing wrong with doing that.
Attorney Pippen:
Okay. John, tell us how people can reach you for more information, or maybe they have a possible pending Medicaid, or a person going into a nursing home, how would they contact you to discuss their options?
Attorney Frazier:
The office number is (727) 586-3306. I’m at extension 104. My cell phone is (727) 748-5374 and my email address is john@attypip.com.
Attorney Pippen:
Alright, John, I hope you have a great Sunday. Thanks for calling in.
Attorney Frazier:
Okay. You too. Thank you very much.
Attorney Pippen:
Alright. Thank you.
You can learn about the most common Medicaid planning strategies right now.
Find more in-depth content on Elder Law and Medicaid Planning on our free resources page.